Master Para Jumbles Strategies
Complete the series! Learn connector-centric methods to order jumbled sentences in 2-3 minutes. Master pronoun tracking, transition words, and mandatory pairs for Type-In-The-Answer questions.
📚 Para Jumbles Flashcards
Master connector-centric strategies with spaced repetition
Loading…
Loading…
🎯 Test Your Para Jumbles Skills
5 CAT-style questions with detailed explanations
🎯 Test Complete!
Reorder the following 4 sentences into a coherent paragraph:
A. This shift has transformed how businesses engage with customers, moving from traditional advertising to interactive dialogue.
B. Social media platforms have fundamentally altered the dynamics of brand communication.
C. However, this accessibility also means negative feedback can spread rapidly, requiring companies to monitor their online presence constantly.
D. Consumers now expect immediate responses and authentic engagement rather than polished marketing messages.
What is the correct order?
✓ Correct! Option B is the answer.
Why B-A-D-C is correct: B introduces the topic (social media’s impact on brand communication) with no backward references. A extends this introduction with “This shift,” referring to B’s transformation. D continues with “now,” showing temporal progression and describing current expectations. C concludes with “However,” contrasting the benefits with challenges, and “this accessibility” refers to the immediate, direct engagement described in D.
Starting with A is wrong because “This shift” requires prior introduction of what shift is being discussed. A has a backward-pointing pronoun (“This”) making it unsuitable as an opening sentence.
Reorder the following 5 sentences into a coherent paragraph:
A. For example, mangrove forests protect coastlines from storm surges while serving as nurseries for numerous fish species.
B. These dual-benefit approaches prove particularly valuable in regions facing both environmental degradation and economic constraints.
C. Conservation strategies increasingly recognize that protecting ecosystems often delivers immediate human benefits alongside long-term environmental gains.
D. Coral reefs provide similar advantages, supporting tourism industries while maintaining marine biodiversity.
E. Such practical considerations help secure funding and community support for conservation initiatives.
What is the correct order?
✓ Correct! Option A is the answer.
Why C-A-D-B-E is correct: C introduces the concept (dual-benefit conservation strategies) broadly. A provides the first example with “For example,” illustrating mangroves’ dual role. D continues examples with “similar advantages,” maintaining parallel structure. B synthesizes the examples with “These dual-benefit approaches,” and E concludes by explaining the practical implications of this approach. The structure follows: general claim → example 1 → example 2 → synthesis → implication.
Placing B second puts “These dual-benefit approaches” before any examples are given. “These” is a demonstrative pronoun requiring specific prior instances to reference. B must come after concrete examples (A and D) that establish what “these approaches” refers to.
Reorder the following 5 sentences into a coherent paragraph:
A. The policy succeeded in reducing energy consumption by 18% over three years, exceeding initial projections.
B. Moreover, the tax system created incentives for businesses to invest in energy-efficient technologies.
C. In 2018, the government implemented a progressive carbon tax designed to discourage fossil fuel use while protecting low-income households.
D. However, critics argue that the policy’s success stemmed partly from concurrent economic slowdown, making causation difficult to establish definitively.
E. Revenue from the tax funded rebates for households earning below the median income, maintaining political support across economic classes.
What is the correct order?
✓ Correct! Option C is the answer.
Why C-E-B-A-D is correct: C introduces the policy with no backward references (uses indefinite framing “a progressive carbon tax”). E follows with “Revenue from the tax,” referring to C’s carbon tax, and explains protective measures. B continues with “Moreover,” adding another positive aspect (business incentives). A reports results with “The policy succeeded,” and D concludes with “However,” introducing criticism after establishing success. Structure: introduction → mechanism → additional benefit → result → qualification.
Placing B before E disrupts the logical explanation of how the policy worked. E describes the revenue mechanism that makes the tax progressive and politically viable—this foundational detail should come immediately after C introduces the policy.
Reorder the following 6 sentences into a coherent paragraph:
A. This phenomenon explains why students often perform poorly on tests despite feeling confident during review sessions.
B. Psychologists term this “illusion of competence”—the mistaken belief that passive recognition equals active recall ability.
C. In contrast, retrieval practice forces the brain to actively reconstruct information, building stronger neural pathways.
D. When studying, many people simply reread notes or highlight text, creating familiarity that masquerades as understanding.
E. Research consistently demonstrates that testing oneself produces better long-term retention than passive review, even when the testing feels more difficult.
F. Therefore, effective study strategies should prioritize self-testing and practice problems over passive review methods.
What is the correct order?
✓ Correct! Option A is the answer.
Why D-B-A-C-E-F is correct: D introduces the problem (passive study methods). B names this phenomenon with “this” referring to D’s described behavior. A explains consequences with “This phenomenon,” creating a chain. C provides contrast with “In contrast,” introducing the solution. E supplies research support for C’s claim. F concludes with “Therefore,” synthesizing into a recommendation. Structure: problem identified → labeled → consequences → solution → evidence → recommendation.
Placing A before B breaks the explanation chain. B’s “this phenomenon” should immediately follow D’s description of the behavior being named. A’s “This phenomenon explains why” assumes the phenomenon has already been labeled (B). The sequence must be: describe behavior (D) → name it (B) → explain its effects (A).
Reorder the following 6 sentences into a coherent paragraph:
A. This paradox becomes particularly acute in cases where majority preferences would violate rights of minority groups.
B. Democratic theory grapples with a fundamental tension: the principle of majority rule can conflict with the protection of individual rights and liberties.
C. Constitutional democracies attempt to resolve this tension through institutional checks—judicial review, super-majority requirements, and entrenched rights provisions that majority voting cannot overturn.
D. However, these very mechanisms limit popular sovereignty, raising questions about whose interpretation of rights should prevail when elected representatives and appointed judges disagree.
E. Some political theorists argue that this tension is not a flaw but a feature, suggesting that the friction between majority rule and rights protection prevents either principle from becoming absolute and tyrannical.
F. Yet others contend that such frameworks ultimately rely on shared normative commitments that majorities must accept, making constitutional constraints only as strong as the underlying democratic culture that supports them.
What is the correct order?
✓ Correct! Option B is the answer.
Why B-A-C-D-E-F is correct: B introduces the central tension (majority rule vs individual rights). A specifies when this becomes most problematic with “This paradox,” maintaining the definitional focus. C presents the institutional solution with “attempt to resolve this tension.” D critiques this solution with “However, these very mechanisms,” referring to C’s constitutional checks. E offers one theoretical perspective with “Some theorists argue,” and F provides competing view with “Yet others contend,” both discussing the broader significance. Structure: problem stated → specified → solution → critique of solution → theoretical perspective 1 → theoretical perspective 2.
Placing C before A disrupts the logical problem-solution sequence. A’s “This paradox becomes particularly acute” should deepen understanding of B’s tension before jumping to solutions. The reader needs to fully grasp the problem’s significance (B + A) before considering how institutions address it (C).
💡 How to Master Para Jumbles
Strategic approaches to order jumbled sentences in 2-3 minutes consistently
The Mandatory Pair Method
Never try to arrange all sentences at once. Instead, identify sentences that must be adjacent due to pronouns, transition words, or logical dependencies. This reduces possibilities exponentially.
Three Types of Mandatory Pairs
- Pronoun Links: “This policy” must follow a sentence introducing a policy. “These structures” must follow plural noun introduction.
- Transition Words: “However” must follow what it contradicts. “For example” must follow the general claim it illustrates.
- Logical Dependencies: Results follow causes. Solutions follow problems. Specific follows general.
Once you’ve identified 2-3 mandatory pairs, you’re not arranging 5-6 sentences (120-720 orders). You’re arranging 2-3 blocks (6-12 orders). This is the speed secret.
Spend 60 seconds identifying mandatory pairs before attempting any full arrangement. This upfront investment saves 2-3 minutes of trial-and-error.
The Pronoun Tracking System
Pronouns are your most reliable connector. Every “this,” “that,” “these,” “they,” or “it” creates a mechanical link to a prior sentence. Unlike subjective “flow,” pronouns have clear rules.
- Number Agreement: “This policy” needs singular noun. “These policies” needs plural. Mismatched number = wrong order.
- Immediate Antecedent: “This” and “these” refer to the immediately preceding sentence, not 2-3 sentences back.
- Article Pattern: “A study” introduces before “the study” refers back. Indefinite before definite.
Common Pronoun Chains
Sentence A: “Researchers developed a new vaccine.”
Sentence B: “The vaccine showed 95% efficacy in trials.”
Sentence C: “This breakthrough could transform treatment.”
Mandatory order: A→B→C (vaccine introduced → vaccine results → “this breakthrough” refers to B’s results)
Circle every pronoun and draw an arrow to its antecedent. If you can’t find a clear antecedent in the preceding sentence, your order is wrong.
Opening & Closing Elimination Strategy
Identifying what cannot open or close is faster and more accurate than identifying what should. Use negative elimination to narrow possibilities immediately.
Cannot Be Opening Sentences
- Starts with “However,” “But,” “Yet,” “Nevertheless” (contrast needs prior claim)
- Starts with “Therefore,” “Thus,” “Hence” (result needs prior cause)
- Starts with “This,” “These,” “Such,” “It,” “They” (backward pronouns)
- Starts with “For example,” “For instance” (needs prior general statement)
- Uses “the + noun” without prior introduction
Cannot Be Closing Sentences
- Introduces new concepts not developed elsewhere
- Poses questions requiring answers
- Uses “first,” “initially,” “to begin with” (opening markers)
- Sets up examples that should follow
Negative elimination typically leaves only 1-2 candidates for opening and 1-2 for closing. Test these combinations instead of testing all possibilities.
After eliminating impossible openings, ask: “Can I understand this sentence without knowing anything that came before?” If no, it’s not the opening.
The Adjacency Verification Test
Before submitting your answer, verify every adjacent pair. This 30-second check catches 80% of errors. For each pair of sentences, ask three questions:
- Question 1: Is there a clear connector (pronoun, transition word, logical link)?
- Question 2: Does sentence 2 depend on information from sentence 1?
- Question 3: Could any other sentence fit better between them?
Example Verification
Your answer: C-A-B-D
Check C→A: Does A’s opening word/concept connect to C? ✓
Check A→B: Does B use “this/however/therefore” referring to A? ✓
Check B→D: Does D build on or follow from B? ✓
If all pairs pass, submit. If any pair fails, reconsider.
If you can’t articulate why two sentences are adjacent, they probably shouldn’t be. “It sounds right” is insufficient. Every connection needs a mechanical reason.
Write your reasoning for each pair in margin during practice. “B follows A because ‘this shift’ in B refers to ‘transformation’ in A.” This trains your eye to spot connections automatically.
The Complete Guide: From Theory to Mastery
You’ve practiced the flashcards. You’ve tested yourself. Now understand why para jumbles strategies work—and how to apply them to any CAT question you’ll encounter.
Understanding Para Jumbles Strategies in CAT Verbal Ability
Para jumbles without options are Type-In-The-Answer (TITA) questions where you reorder 4-6 jumbled sentences into a coherent paragraph. CAT typically includes 3 para jumble questions offering high ROI when correct, but they punish guesswork because there are no options to eliminate.
The fundamental challenge is building logic from scratch. You can’t rely on “this sounds better” or elimination. You need a systematic method that identifies mandatory connections between sentences before attempting any full ordering.
Most test-takers try different arrangements until something “feels right.” This wastes time and produces inconsistent results. The correct approach is connector-centric: find sentences that must follow each other due to pronouns, transition words, or logical dependencies, then arrange these fixed pairs into a paragraph.
Pause & Reflect
Before reading further: When you solve para jumbles, do you test full arrangements or build from mandatory pairs?
Most students waste time testing arrangements: “Does ABCD work? Let me try ACBD. Now BCAD…” This approach can require testing 120-720 possibilities for 5-6 sentences.
The connector-centric method is exponentially faster. Identify 2-3 mandatory pairs first (A must follow C, D must follow B), then arrange just these blocks. You’ve reduced 720 possibilities to 6-12.
Time spent identifying mandatory connections upfront (60 seconds) saves minutes of random testing. Always build from certainties, not possibilities.
Para Jumbles Without Options: What Makes Them Different
Para jumbles test your ability to recognize logical flow, not spot wrong answers. Every sentence must connect through clear references, logical relationships, or transition markers.
The absence of options means you can’t use comparative elimination. When stuck between two possible orders, you must have logical reasons for choosing. “This reads better” is insufficient when both might read acceptably but only one is logically tight.
Key Insight: Para jumbles reward precision. A correct answer has every connection justified by pronouns, connectors, or logic. A “close” answer earns zero points.
TITA format creates time pressure. You can’t test every possible arrangement of 5-6 sentences (120-720 orders). Identify mandatory pairs first, reducing possibilities dramatically.
The 7-Step Connector-Centric Method
Execute these steps in order. Skipping steps leads to guesswork.
Step 1: Skim and Sense the Topic
Read all sentences once to identify the central theme and tone. Is this factual, argumentative, narrative, or conceptual? This prevents forcing incompatible sentences together.
Step 2: Shortlist Opening and Closing Candidates
Opening sentences introduce the topic, use indefinite articles (“a,” “an”), contain no backward pronouns (“this,” “it”), and set context. Closing sentences wrap up, provide implications, or suggest future directions.
Identify 1-2 strong candidates for each position to narrow possibilities early.
Test Your Understanding
Quick check: Can a sentence starting with “However,” ever be the opening sentence? Why or why not?
No, never. “However” is a contrast marker that must follow a claim it contradicts or qualifies. It refers backward to prior information.
This mechanical rule applies to all backward-looking connectors: “Therefore,” “Thus,” “Moreover,” “Furthermore,” “Additionally,” “This,” “These,” “It,” “They,” “So.”
These cannot open because they assume the reader already knows something that hasn’t been stated yet. Opening sentences introduce; they don’t refer back.
Use negative elimination: eliminate sentences that definitely cannot open (those with backward references), then test remaining 1-2 candidates.
Step 3: Build Mandatory Pairs Using Connectors
Hunt for sentences that must follow each other:
Pronoun connections: “this policy” must follow a sentence introducing a policy.
Transition words: “However” must follow the claim it contradicts. “Therefore” must follow its cause. “For example” must follow a general statement.
Sentence A: “Urban planners have proposed vertical forests.”
Sentence B: “However, these structures face maintenance challenges.”
Mandatory pair: A→B (B uses “However” and “these structures”)
Step 4: Use Chronology and Logical Patterns
Look for time markers: “initially,” “first” come before “currently,” “now” before “ultimately,” “in the future.”
Identify logical flows: general before specific, problems before solutions, causes before effects, questions before answers.
Step 5: Form Blocks, Not Full Orders
Combine mandatory pairs into 2-3 sentence blocks. Decide which block functions as opening (broadest context), middle (development), or closing (conclusion).
Strategy in Action
You’ve identified two mandatory pairs: C→A and D→B. How many possible full arrangements do you need to test?
Only 2 arrangements: either (C→A)→(D→B) or (D→B)→(C→A).
You’re not testing 24 possible orders of 4 sentences. You’re testing which of two blocks should come first. This is the power of the block-building approach.
With 5 sentences and 3 mandatory pairs identified, you might have just 6-12 arrangements to consider instead of 120. With 6 sentences, it’s 12-24 instead of 720.
The more mandatory pairs you identify, the fewer arrangements you need to test. Invest time in Step 3 (building pairs) to save massive time in arrangement testing.
Step 6: Elimination Strategy
Once you’ve fixed 2 certain connections, test where remaining sentences fit. Don’t re-evaluate entire arrangements. Check only the first point where two candidate orders differ.
Step 7: Adjacency and Coherence Check
For your final order, verify every adjacent pair. Ask: “Why does sentence 2 follow sentence 1?” If you can’t articulate the connection, your order is wrong.
Opening and Closing Sentence Identification
Opening sentences introduce the main topic, provide context, use generic references (“Technology has transformed…”) rather than specific ones (“This transformation…”), and require no prior information.
Check for indefinite articles. “A new study” is more likely to open than “The study” because “the” assumes prior mention.
Opening Red Flags: Sentences starting with “However,” “Therefore,” “This,” “These,” “So,” or “It” are almost never opening sentences. They refer backward.
Closing sentences summarize, state implications, or suggest future developments. They feel complete—you could end naturally there. They rarely introduce new terms or open fresh questions.
Common closing patterns: “This demonstrates…,” “As a result…,” “Thus, we see…” These wrap up rather than advance.
Reality Check
Be honest: Do you verify every adjacent pair before submitting, or do you submit when it “feels right”?
The adjacency check catches 80% of errors but takes only 30 seconds. Yet most students skip it because their answer “feels right.”
Para jumbles punish this shortcut severely. Unlike RC inference questions where close answers might earn partial credit, para jumbles are binary: perfect order or zero points.
The adjacency check isn’t optional—it’s the final gate between you and avoidable mistakes. Make it automatic.
Your answer isn’t ready to submit until you can explain every single connection: “B follows A because ‘this shift’ refers to A’s ‘transformation.'” No explanation = wrong order.
Mandatory Pairs: The Foundation of Your Strategy
Pronoun tracking is non-negotiable. Every “this,” “that,” “it,” “they” must have a clear antecedent in the preceding sentence. Number must agree—plural pronouns need plural antecedents.
Transition word rules:
- “However,” “but,” “yet” introduce contrast
- “Therefore,” “thus,” “hence” indicate results
- “For example,” “for instance” provide examples
- “Moreover,” “furthermore” continue a point
Article patterns: “A problem” introduces before “the problem” refers back.
Common Traps That Cost You Points
Don’t place connector words incorrectly. “However” cannot be first. “Therefore” needs supporting sentences before it.
Don’t assume word repetition means adjacency. Two sentences mentioning “climate change” might not be adjacent if there’s intervening elaboration.
Don’t put examples before claims. “For example” sentences cannot precede the general statement they exemplify.
Don’t end with sentences that open questions or introduce new subtopics.
Fatal Error: Ignoring pronoun number agreement. “They” cannot refer to a singular noun. “This policy” cannot refer to plural “these reforms.”
Don’t force chronological order when the passage is conceptual. Argumentative or definitional paragraphs organize by logic, not timeline.
Don’t rely on length. Content determines position, not word count.
Don’t skip the final adjacency check. Verify that you can explain why each sentence follows the previous one.
Final Self-Assessment
After reading this entire guide, can you now name the three types of mandatory pairs and give one example of each?
If you can explain this clearly, you’ve internalized the connector-centric method. If you’re still fuzzy, that’s your signal to review.
The three types:
1. Pronoun Links: “This policy must follow a sentence introducing a policy.”
2. Transition Words: “However must follow the claim it contradicts.”
3. Logical Dependencies: “Results follow causes; solutions follow problems.”
If you can’t explain all three types with examples, review the flashcards and practice identifying mandatory pairs in 10 sample para jumbles before attempting more questions.
Building Speed and Confidence
Practice identifying mandatory pairs in 30 seconds. Read sentences, then list which must be adjacent due to pronouns or transitions.
Track your error patterns. Misidentifying openings? Ignoring pronouns? Forcing chronology? Each error needs specific practice.
Time yourself. Para jumbles should take 2-3 minutes. Practice the 7-step process until automatic.
[INTERNAL LINK PLACEHOLDERS]
- [Link to Verbal Deck 21: Para Summary]
- [Link to Verbal Deck 23: Para Completion Strategies]
- [Link to Verbal Deck 24: Para Completion Connectors]
- [Link to RC Deck 5: Function & Structure]
- [Link to 30-Module Series Hub]
- [Link to Revision Decks Hub]
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about para jumbles strategies answered
Para jumble questions typically account for 2-3 questions out of the 24 VARC questions in CAT. These are Type-In-The-Answer (TITA) format, meaning you must type the correct sentence order rather than choosing from options. This makes them higher risk but also higher reward when you have a systematic approach.
The exact count varies by exam, but CAT has consistently included at least 2 para jumbles in recent years. They usually involve 4-6 sentences that must be reordered into a coherent paragraph. Unlike RC questions where you can eliminate options, para jumbles require you to construct the answer from scratch.
The TITA format means no partial credit and no option elimination. You either submit the correct sequence or you’re wrong. This severity makes systematic method crucial. Guessing costs you points with no safety net, so invest time learning the connector-centric approach rather than relying on intuition.
Execute the 7-step connector-centric method every time. Step 1: Skim all sentences to understand the topic and tone. Step 2: Identify opening and closing candidates. Step 3: Build mandatory pairs using pronoun connections and transition words. Step 4: Use chronology and logical patterns. Step 5: Form sentence blocks. Step 6: Use elimination strategy. Step 7: Verify every adjacent pair.
The core principle is identifying sentences that must be adjacent before attempting to order the entire paragraph. “However” must follow the claim it contradicts. “For example” must follow the general statement it illustrates. “This approach” must follow a sentence that describes an approach. These mandatory connections dramatically reduce possible arrangements.
Initial skim: 20-30 seconds
Identify mandatory pairs: 40-60 seconds
Form blocks and order: 40-60 seconds
Final verification: 20-30 seconds
Total: 2-3 minutes per para jumble
Build blocks rather than testing complete sequences. If you’ve identified that A→C and D→B are mandatory pairs, you only need to decide how these two blocks connect, not test all 24 possible arrangements of 4 sentences. This block-building approach is exponentially faster than trial-and-error.
Always check your final answer with the adjacency test: for each sentence pair, can you explain why sentence 2 follows sentence 1? If you can’t articulate the connector, reference, or logical reason, your order is probably wrong.
Use elimination based on what definitely cannot open. Sentences starting with “However,” “Therefore,” “This,” “These,” “Such,” “It,” “They,” or “So” are almost never opening sentences because they refer backward to prior information. This negative elimination often leaves only 1-2 candidates.
Check for indefinite articles and generic framing. “A new study” is more likely to open than “The study” because “the” assumes prior mention. Opening sentences also provide the broadest context—they introduce the topic rather than develop it.
Sentence A: “These findings challenge conventional wisdom about learning.”
Sentence B: “A recent study on memory formation has revealed unexpected patterns.”
B must open because A’s “These findings” requires prior mention of findings, while B introduces “a recent study” without assuming prior knowledge.
If you’re torn between two candidates, check which one requires less assumed knowledge. The opening sentence should be comprehensible without any prior context. If understanding a sentence requires knowing something not yet stated, it’s not the opener.
Use opening identification as a tiebreaker, not the primary strategy. Some paragraphs have multiple plausible openings depending on interpretation. Focus on mandatory pairs (pronoun-antecedent connections, transition words) which are more mechanical and less ambiguous than opening identification.
Para jumbles should take 2-3 minutes each. This is slightly longer than some VARC question types but justified because getting them right scores full points with no partial credit, while guessing has lower success rates than other question types.
If you reach 3 minutes without a clear answer, make your best guess based on the pairs you’re confident about and move on. Don’t spend 5+ minutes perfecting one para jumble at the cost of other VARC questions. The opportunity cost of excessive time is real.
Build speed through practice. Initially, the 7-step method might take 4-5 minutes as you’re learning. With practice, identifying mandatory pairs becomes automatic, and you’ll consistently finish in 2-3 minutes. Time yourself during practice to build the habit of moving quickly through the steps.
Remember that para jumbles have no partial credit. A partially correct answer earns the same zero points as a completely wrong answer. This makes accuracy more important than speed. Better to spend 3 minutes and get it right than rush in 90 seconds and guess incorrectly.
Generally yes, but not always. Fewer sentences mean fewer possible arrangements (24 for 4 sentences vs 720 for 6 sentences), making them faster to solve when you identify key pairs. However, difficulty also depends on how clearly the connector words and references signal mandatory adjacencies.
A well-structured 6-sentence jumble with clear transition markers can be easier than a 4-sentence jumble with ambiguous connections. The presence of explicit connectors (“However,” “For example,” “Therefore”) matters more than sentence count.
Longer para jumbles often have more mandatory pairs to identify, which actually helps. With 6 sentences, you might find 3-4 certain connections, heavily constraining possible arrangements. With 4 sentences, you might only find 1-2 certain pairs, leaving more ambiguity.
1. Clarity of pronoun antecedents and transition words
2. Whether the topic uses clear logical/chronological flow
3. Number of ambiguous connections
4. Sentence count (least important factor)
Don’t let sentence count intimidate you. Apply the same systematic method regardless of length. Longer jumbles just mean spending slightly more time on Step 3 (identifying mandatory pairs), but the process remains identical.
Both indicate backward reference, but they function differently. “This” or “these” are demonstrative pronouns that refer to specific nouns, ideas, or situations mentioned immediately before. “The” is a definite article indicating the noun has been previously introduced or is contextually unique.
“This approach” requires a prior sentence describing an approach. “The study” requires earlier mention of a study. “This” creates tighter coupling—the antecedent is usually in the immediately preceding sentence. “The” allows slightly more distance—the noun might have been introduced 1-2 sentences earlier.
“A new regulation was proposed. The regulation faced immediate opposition.”
“The” signals that “regulation” was just introduced with “a new regulation.”
“Several strategies were tested. This approach proved most effective.”
“This approach” refers back to one of the “strategies,” requiring the antecedent to be present.
Both patterns are mechanical and reliable. When you see “the + noun” that wasn’t introduced in that same sentence, look for “a/an + noun” in an earlier sentence. When you see “this/these + noun,” identify what specific thing it references in a previous sentence.
Number agreement matters critically for “this” vs “these.” “This policy” must refer to a singular policy. “These policies” must refer to plural policies. Mismatching numbers indicates wrong sentence order.
Master the mandatory pair identification drill. Take 20 para jumbles and spend the first 90 seconds only identifying which sentences must be adjacent, without trying to order the whole paragraph. Write down pairs like “A→C” (C must follow A) and explain why. This builds pattern recognition for pronoun chains and transition words.
Practice the opening elimination drill. For every para jumble, identify all sentences that definitely cannot open (those starting with “However,” “Therefore,” “This,” etc.) before looking for what should open. This negative elimination is faster and more accurate than positive identification.
1. Solve a para jumble using the 7-step method
2. For each adjacent pair in your answer, write the specific reason they’re connected (pronoun reference, transition word, logical sequence)
3. If you can’t justify a pairing, your answer is probably wrong
4. Check the explanation and identify which connector you missed
5. Do 15 jumbles this way—your accuracy will improve 20-30%
Create a personal reference sheet of transition words grouped by function: contrast markers (however, but, yet), result markers (therefore, thus, hence), example markers (for instance, for example), continuation markers (moreover, furthermore). When you see these words, immediately know what must come before them.
Track your error patterns. Do you place “for example” before the general claim? Ignore pronoun antecedents? Miss the “however” contrasts? Each error type needs specific targeted practice. If you consistently make pronoun errors, drill 20 jumbles focusing only on “this/these/it/they” references.
Finally, practice the final verification step religiously. After ordering sentences, spend 30 seconds checking each adjacent pair. Ask: “Does sentence B logically follow sentence A? Is there a clear connector or reference?” This habit catches errors before you submit and builds sensitivity to logical flow.
Connect with Prashant
Founder, WordPandit & EDGE | CAT VARC Expert
With 18+ years of teaching experience and thousands of successful CAT aspirants, I’m here to help you master VARC. Whether you’re stuck on RC passages, vocabulary building, or exam strategy—let’s connect and solve it together.
Stuck on RC or VARC? Let’s Solve It Together! 💡
Don’t let doubts slow you down. Whether it’s a tricky RC passage, vocabulary confusion, or exam strategy—I’m here to help. Choose your preferred way to connect and let’s tackle your challenges head-on.
🌟 Explore The Learning Inc. Network
8 specialized platforms. 1 mission: Your success in competitive exams.
Trusted by 50,000+ learners across India
Learn.WordPandit
Learn With Prashant Sir
Mentor-led courses for CAT, GMAT, GRE, GD/PI/WAT. Structured learning with expert guidance.
WordPandit
Master Words. Master Exams.
10,000+ words with roots methodology. Your vocabulary foundation for competitive exams.
Preplite
Smart Learning. Smaller Budgets.
Affordable self-prep micro-courses. Pay only for what you need. Learn at your pace.
Readlite
Read Smart. Comprehend Better.
Daily curated articles across 60+ subjects. Build reading comprehension for RC mastery.
Easy Hinglish
English Seekhna Ab Hua Aasan!
Learn English the Indian way. Vocabulary explained in Hindi and English for better retention.
GD PI WAT
Ace Your MBA Interviews.
1,000+ GD topics, PI questions, and WAT guidance. Complete MBA admission prep.
GK365
Stay Informed. Stay Ahead.
Daily GK updates and current affairs. Never miss what matters for competitive exams.
Ask English Pro
Your Personal English Mentor.
Get expert answers to all your English questions with detailed video explanations.