Master Tone & Attitude Questions
Decode the author’s attitude in 30 seconds. Learn to identify tone markers, eliminate wrong answers systematically, and never confuse “critical” with “cynical” again.
📚 Tone & Attitude Flashcards
Master tone recognition with 30 comprehensive cards
Loading…
Loading…
🎯 Test Your Tone Recognition Skills
5 CAT-style questions with detailed explanations
🎯 Test Complete!
Social media platforms have fundamentally altered how information spreads in modern society. Within hours, a single post can reach millions of users across continents. This unprecedented speed and scale of information dissemination has democratized public discourse, allowing voices that were previously marginalized to find audiences. Small businesses can now compete with large corporations for consumer attention. Grassroots movements can organize protests and coordinate action without traditional institutional support. However, this same technology has enabled the rapid spread of misinformation. False claims can achieve viral status before fact-checkers have time to respond. The challenge facing society is not the technology itself but developing the digital literacy necessary to navigate this new information landscape responsibly.
What is the author’s attitude toward social media platforms?
✓ Correct! Option C is the answer.
Why C is correct: The author presents both significant benefits (democratized discourse, empowered marginalized voices, enabled grassroots organization) and serious concerns (rapid misinformation spread). The passage concludes that “the challenge is not the technology itself” but rather developing digital literacy, showing the author sees the issue as solvable rather than inherently negative. The even treatment of positive and negative aspects, combined with a solution-oriented conclusion, indicates a balanced perspective.
Option A: While the author acknowledges benefits, words like “unprecedented” and “democratized” appear in descriptive context, not enthusiastic promotion. The author spends equal time on problems, which contradicts “enthusiastically supportive.”
Option D: While the author notes misinformation concerns, “alarmed” suggests heightened fear or emergency. The solution-oriented conclusion shows measured concern rather than alarm.
Urban rewilding projects have gained attention as cities seek to restore natural ecosystems within metropolitan areas. These initiatives typically involve removing invasive species, reintroducing native plants, and creating wildlife corridors through urban landscapes. Proponents celebrate the ecological benefits, reduced maintenance costs compared to traditional landscaping, and enhanced quality of life for residents. The sight of butterflies, birds, and small mammals returning to city centers has inspired community engagement with environmental issues. Yet the approach is not without complications. Property owners sometimes resist changes to familiar landscapes. Native plant species may take years to establish themselves, creating periods where rewilded areas appear neglected. Wildlife presence can create conflicts, from deer damaging gardens to increased tick populations. These practical difficulties require patience and community education to overcome.
How does the author view urban rewilding projects?
✓ Correct! Option A is the answer.
Why A is correct: The author uses positive language when describing benefits (“celebrate,” “inspired,” “enhanced quality of life”) and acknowledges the approach has genuine merit. However, the passage then details specific practical difficulties (resistance, establishment time, wildlife conflicts) that are presented as real obstacles. The conclusion that these “require patience and community education to overcome” shows the author believes these challenges are surmountable, indicating support tempered by awareness of implementation realities.
Option B: The author doesn’t question the ecological benefits themselves. The passage states these benefits exist and focuses criticism on practical implementation issues.
Option D: The author’s language choices reveal clear positioning. Words like “celebrate,” “inspired,” and “enhanced” show positive framing. The solution-oriented conclusion shows the author believes in the approach.
The four-day workweek has emerged from pilot programs into serious policy discussions. Companies experimenting with reduced hours report maintained productivity levels, decreased employee burnout, and improved recruitment and retention. Workers describe better work-life balance and increased job satisfaction. These outcomes seem to validate long-standing critiques of industrial-era labor norms that prioritized time spent over output achieved. However, the enthusiasm surrounding these pilot programs may be premature. Most trials involve knowledge workers in industries where output is difficult to measure objectively. Manufacturing, healthcare, and service industries face different constraints. A factory cannot simply produce the same output in fewer hours without significant capital investment in automation. Hospitals cannot reduce staffing hours without compromising patient care. The four-day workweek may represent an important evolution for specific sectors, but presenting it as a universal solution oversimplifies the diverse nature of modern labor markets.
What is the author’s overall stance on the four-day workweek?
✓ Correct! Option A is the answer.
Why A is correct: The author acknowledges genuine benefits from pilot programs and validates critiques of traditional labor norms, showing some optimism. However, the passage then extensively discusses sector-specific limitations and warns against “premature enthusiasm” and “oversimplifying,” indicating caution. The conclusion that it “may represent an important evolution for specific sectors” combines recognition of value (optimistic) with significant qualifications about universal applicability (cautious).
Option B: The author questions the generalizability of results, not their validity. The critique is about scope of application, not legitimacy of results.
Option D: While the passage presents multiple viewpoints, the final position is clear: promising for specific sectors, problematic as universal solution. The author’s conclusion represents a judgment, not mere presentation.
The decolonization of museum collections has sparked necessary conversations about cultural property and institutional responsibility. Museums built on colonial-era acquisition practices face legitimate questions about the origins and ownership of their holdings. Artifacts obtained through coercion, theft, or exploitative trade clearly warrant repatriation to source communities. The British Museum’s continued possession of the Parthenon Marbles exemplifies the moral bankruptcy of “finders keepers” justifications for cultural appropriation. Yet some repatriation advocates push arguments to troubling extremes. Proposals that museums return all objects to their geographic regions of origin would essentially mandate cultural segregation, with Egyptian artifacts only in Egypt, Greek sculptures only in Greece. This position ignores the educational value of cross-cultural exposure and the reality that human cultural history is one of constant migration, exchange, and synthesis. The goal should be ethical stewardship and collaborative relationships with source communities, not complete geographic sorting of human cultural production.
The author’s tone toward museum decolonization efforts can best be described as:
✓ Correct! Option A is the answer.
Why A is correct: The author strongly supports repatriation for items obtained through coercion or theft, using harsh language like “moral bankruptcy” to criticize resistance to returning clearly stolen items. However, the passage then criticizes “troubling extremes” and “problematic” aspects of complete geographic sorting proposals. The conclusion advocates “ethical stewardship and collaborative relationships,” showing support for the movement’s core goals while rejecting its most expansive interpretations.
Option B: The author explicitly validates “legitimate questions” and calls colonial-era practices morally wrong. This option focuses only on the critique of extreme positions while ignoring substantial agreement with core arguments.
Option D: The author uses strong judgment words: “moral bankruptcy,” “clearly warrant,” “troubling extremes.” This is not analytical neutrality. The author takes clear stances on what’s right and wrong.
Contemporary debates about objectivity in journalism reveal deep confusion about the nature of truth and perspective. Critics of “objective” journalism argue that neutrality is impossible, that every choice of what to report and how to frame it reflects subjective values. They advocate instead for transparent advocacy journalism where reporters openly declare their perspectives. This critique contains an important insight about the constructed nature of news narratives. But the conclusion drawn from this insight is precisely backwards. The impossibility of perfect objectivity is an argument for striving toward it, not abandoning the effort. A surgeon’s inability to achieve perfectly sterile conditions doesn’t justify operating in a contaminated environment. The goal is harm reduction, not perfection. Similarly, journalists should minimize rather than embrace bias. The transparent advocacy model merely makes bias more visible without making it less distorting. What passes for sophisticated epistemology in these arguments is actually a convenient rationalization for partisan messaging. The recognition that pure objectivity is unattainable should humble us, not liberate us from the obligation to pursue it.
Which description best captures the author’s tone throughout this passage?
✓ Correct! Option B is the answer.
Why B is correct: The author uses consistently negative language toward advocacy journalism arguments: “deep confusion,” “precisely backwards,” “convenient rationalization for partisan messaging,” and “sophisticated epistemology” used sarcastically. While briefly acknowledging “an important insight,” the passage overwhelmingly criticizes the conclusions drawn from this insight. The strong metaphor of operating in contaminated conditions and the forceful conclusion about obligation show clear dismissal of advocacy journalism arguments.
Option A: “Resigned acceptance” suggests passive acknowledgment. But the author actively argues journalists “should minimize rather than embrace bias” and maintains they have an “obligation to pursue” objectivity. This is active criticism, not resignation.
Option D: While the passage acknowledges one valid point from critics, it spends the vast majority arguing against their conclusions. The author clearly favors the objectivity-as-goal position, not balance.
💡 How to Master Tone Questions
Strategic approaches proven to boost accuracy from 60% to 90%+ in 7 days
The 3-Step Framework Method
Every tone question requires three determinations before you look at options. Skip any step and your accuracy drops.
- Step 1: Identify Balance – Is the author positive, negative, or neutral? Read first and last paragraphs. Check verb and adjective choices.
- Step 2: Identify Target – What specifically is the author addressing? A person? A theory? A policy? An approach?
- Step 3: Identify Intensity – Is the attitude mild or strong? “Skeptical” is mild doubt. “Dismissive” is strong rejection.
These three steps give you a profile: “Mildly critical of the implementation strategy.” Now you eliminate options systematically rather than guessing based on which words sound right.
Strategic Elimination in Rounds
Eliminate options systematically to remove 3-4 choices in under 30 seconds:
Round 1: Eliminate Opposite Directions
If the passage is positive, eliminate all negative options immediately. If neutral, eliminate both strong positive and strong negative options. This typically removes 2-3 options in 10 seconds.
Round 2: Check Target Accuracy
The remaining options should mention what the author is actually addressing. If the author is “critical of implementation strategies,” an option saying “critical of the underlying theory” is wrong even if the direction matches.
Round 3: Match Intensity Level
You’re down to 2 options with correct direction and target. One says “critical,” the other “dismissive.” Check intensity markers in the passage. Does the author merely point out flaws (critical) or actively mock the approach (dismissive)?
Marker Word Tracking System
Track specific words that signal the author’s attitude. These markers appear in every passage.
- Hedge Words (Signal Caution): may, might, perhaps, seems, appears, suggests. When the author uses these, they’re being tentative.
- Intensifiers (Signal Strong Tone): just, only, merely, simply, clearly, obviously, certainly. These amplify the author’s position.
- Contrast Markers (Signal Nuance): however, yet, but, nevertheless, although. Three or more usually means balanced or nuanced tone.
- Direction Indicators: unfortunately, fortunately, surprisingly, predictably. These reveal how the author feels about facts they’re reporting.
After each paragraph, note: positive, negative, or neutral? Track shifts across the passage. The pattern reveals the author’s stance and final position.
The 30-Second Recognition Drill
Top scorers identify tone in the first 30 seconds of reading. They’re not reading for content—they’re scanning for attitude markers.
Practice This Drill:
Read only the first sentence of each paragraph and the last sentence of the passage. Can you identify positive/negative/neutral from just these sentences? In 70% of passages, yes. This trains you to spot stance markers instantly.
- Track verbs the author chooses: “Transform” is more positive than “alter.” “Challenge” is more neutral than “undermine.”
- Track adjectives: “Innovative” = positive. “Unproven” = skeptical. “Promising” = optimistic. “Problematic” = critical.
- Don’t get distracted by difficult vocabulary in passage content. Focus on stance markers.
When practicing, write down your three-step profile before looking at options: “Mildly critical of implementation, targeting policy execution, 60% negative 40% acknowledging benefits.” Then match this profile to options. This prevents options from influencing your passage analysis.
The Complete Guide: From Theory to Mastery
You’ve practiced the flashcards. You’ve tested yourself. Now understand why the strategies work—and how to adapt them to any CAT tone question you’ll encounter.
Understanding RC Tone Questions in CAT Reading Comprehension
RC tone questions test something fundamentally different from main idea or inference questions. They ask: How does the author feel about the subject? What’s their attitude? This is not about what the passage says. It’s about how the author positions themselves.
Most test-takers confuse tone with content. They focus on the topic instead of the author’s stance. The passage might discuss artificial intelligence, but the question asks whether the author is skeptical, optimistic, or neutral about it. Miss this distinction and you’ll pick answers based on subject matter rather than attitude.
CAT exploits this confusion systematically. Wrong answers will match the passage’s topic perfectly but misrepresent the author’s feelings. An option might say “critical of technological determinism” when the author is actually “cautiously optimistic about technological progress.” Both involve technology, but the attitudes are opposite.
The key skill is separating what is being discussed from how the author feels about it. Master this separation and tone questions become mechanical. Skip it and you’re guessing based on vocabulary recognition.
Pause & Reflect
Before reading further: Think of the last RC passage you read. Can you state the author’s tone in one sentence?
If you struggled with this, you’re likely confusing the topic (what the passage discusses) with the tone (how the author feels about it).
This is the #1 trap in tone questions. The topic is just the subject matter. The tone is the author’s specific attitude toward that topic.
Always ask: “How does the author feel?” not “What is this passage about?”
The Three-Step Tone Identification Framework
Every tone question requires three determinations before you look at options. Skip any step and your accuracy drops.
Step 1: Identify the Balance – Is the author positive, negative, or neutral? This is your baseline. Read the first and last paragraphs. Check the verbs and adjectives the author chooses. “The policy transformed urban planning” signals positive. “The policy disrupted established practices” signals negative. “The policy altered urban planning approaches” signals neutral.
Step 2: Identify the Target – What specifically is the author addressing? A person? A theory? A policy? An approach to doing something? The target matters because the author might be positive about the goal but negative about the execution.
Critical Distinction: An author can be “supportive of renewable energy but critical of current implementation strategies.” The target determines which attitude you’re measuring.
Step 3: Identify the Intensity – Is the attitude mild or strong? “Skeptical” is mild doubt. “Dismissive” is strong rejection. “Appreciative” is mild positive. “Enthusiastic” is strong positive. CAT tests whether you can distinguish these intensity levels.
Test Your Understanding
Quick check: If a passage acknowledges benefits of a policy but spends more time discussing its significant limitations, what’s the overall tone?
The overall tone is mildly critical or balanced with reservations.
Why? The passage acknowledges benefits (not completely negative) but emphasizes limitations (not positive). This is a classic pattern: initial acknowledgment + dominant critique = mildly critical overall.
Track the ratio: If 70% of content criticizes and 30% acknowledges positives, the tone is “critical with minor acknowledgments,” not balanced.
Major Tone Categories and Their Markers
Organize tone vocabulary into five major buckets. This prevents vocabulary overwhelm and speeds recognition.
Positive Tones: approving, appreciative, supportive, optimistic, enthusiastic, admiring, reverent. Look for: praising language, acknowledging benefits, highlighting successes, future-oriented hope.
Negative Tones: critical, skeptical, sarcastic, cynical, dismissive, contemptuous, alarmed, pessimistic. Look for: identifying flaws, questioning assumptions, mocking tone, highlighting failures, warnings about consequences.
Neutral Tones: analytical, descriptive, factual, explanatory, objective, informative, balanced. Look for: presenting multiple viewpoints, avoiding judgment words, equal treatment of pros and cons, emphasis on data over opinion.
Example: “The study methodology included 500 participants across three cities, measuring five variables over six months.”
Tone: Descriptive/Factual (pure information, no judgment)
“While the study’s methodology appears rigorous, the limited geographic scope raises questions about generalizability.”
Tone: Cautiously Critical (acknowledging strength but highlighting limitation)
Strategic Elimination Using Direction and Intensity
Once you have your three-step profile, eliminate options in this order. This systematic approach is faster than comparing all options simultaneously.
Round 1: Eliminate Opposite Directions – If the passage is positive, eliminate all negative options immediately. If neutral, eliminate both strong positive and strong negative options. This typically removes 2-3 options in 10 seconds.
Round 2: Check Target Accuracy – The remaining options should mention what the author is actually addressing. If the author is “critical of implementation strategies,” an option saying “critical of the underlying theory” is wrong even if the direction matches.
Common Trap: Options that match direction but miss the target. “Skeptical of artificial intelligence” vs “skeptical of current AI regulation.” Same direction, different targets.
Strategy in Action
You’ve eliminated options to two finalists: “critical” vs “dismissive.” Both are negative. How do you choose?
Check for intensity markers in the passage.
Critical: Points out flaws, questions effectiveness (e.g., “The approach has several limitations”)
Dismissive: Actively mocks, considers unworthy (e.g., “The approach is laughably simplistic”)
Look for words like “merely,” “simply,” or mocking phrases. If present, it’s dismissive. If the critique is reasoned without ridicule, it’s critical.
Dismissive is critical + contempt. If you don’t see contempt or ridicule, choose the milder option.
Critical Marker Words That Signal Tone Shifts
Tone questions become easier when you track specific words that signal the author’s attitude. These markers appear in every passage.
Hedge Words (Signal Caution/Mild Tone): may, might, perhaps, seems, appears, suggests, could, possibly. When the author uses these, they’re being tentative. “The data suggests improvement” is milder than “The data proves improvement.”
Intensifiers (Signal Strong Tone): just, only, merely, simply, clearly, obviously, certainly, undoubtedly, allegedly, supposedly. These amplify the author’s position. “This is merely a temporary solution” shows stronger dismissal than “This is a temporary solution.”
Contrast Markers (Signal Mixed/Nuanced Tone): however, yet, but, nevertheless, although, while, despite. These introduce complications or counter-points. Count them. Three or more contrast markers usually means balanced or nuanced tone.
Example: “The theory offers valuable insights. However, its practical applications remain limited. Yet, dismissing it entirely would be premature.”
Tone: Balanced/Measured (praise, then criticism, then defense against extreme criticism)
Reality Check
Be honest: How often do you count contrast markers (“however,” “yet,” “but”) when reading a passage?
Most students don’t track these systematically. 99+ percentilers do.
If you see 3+ contrast markers, the author is presenting a nuanced or balanced view. If you see 0-1, the author has a clear directional stance (positive or negative).
This simple counting strategy eliminates 2-3 wrong options instantly because you know whether the tone is directional or balanced.
Start counting “however,” “yet,” “but” in every passage. It takes 5 seconds and transforms your accuracy on tone questions.
Handling Passages Where Authors Show Both Sides
Some passages present both positive and negative elements deliberately. The author acknowledges benefits while noting limitations. How do you determine the overall tone?
Look for the conclusion. Where does the author end up? If they spend three paragraphs on benefits and one on limitations, ending with “these challenges don’t diminish the approach’s value,” the overall tone is positive despite acknowledging problems.
Check for qualifying language. “While X has merit, it ultimately fails to address Y” is different from “While X has limitations, it successfully addresses Y.” The first is ultimately negative. The second is ultimately positive. The clause after “while” is the qualification. The main clause is the position.
Formula: If the final paragraph reinforces the opening stance, that’s the tone. If it complicates or reverses the opening, the final position dominates.
Final Self-Assessment
After reading this entire guide, can you now apply the 3-step framework (Balance, Target, Intensity) to the next RC passage you read?
If you’re ready to apply it, you’ve internalized the framework. If you’re still fuzzy, that’s your signal to review.
Here’s a simple self-test for the next passage you read:
“Before looking at options: (1) Is the author positive, negative, or neutral? (2) What specifically is the target? (3) Is the intensity mild or strong?”
Write these three answers down. Then check the options. If you did this correctly, 3-4 options will eliminate themselves instantly.
Practice this on 5 passages today. By the 5th passage, this framework will feel automatic. That’s when your accuracy jumps from 60% to 90%+.
Building Speed in Tone Recognition
Top scorers identify tone in the first 30 seconds of reading. They’re not reading for content. They’re scanning for attitude markers.
Practice this drill: Read only the first sentence of each paragraph and the last sentence of the passage. Can you identify positive/negative/neutral from just these sentences? In 70% of passages, you can. This drill trains you to spot stance markers instantly.
Track verbs and adjectives the author chooses. “Transform” is more positive than “alter.” “Challenge” is more neutral than “undermine.” “Innovative” is positive. “Unproven” is skeptical. Build a mental catalog of these word choices.
Ready to test your understanding? The 30 flashcards above cover every nuance of tone questions, and the practice exercise gives you real CAT-style questions to apply these strategies.
Next, explore related RC question types to master comprehensive VARC preparation.
❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about RC tone questions answered
Tone questions appear in approximately 30-40% of CAT RC passages, making them one of the most frequent question types after main idea and inference questions.
In a typical 4-passage RC section, you’ll likely see 2-4 tone or attitude questions. Some passages will have both a tone question (“What is the author’s attitude toward X?”) and a primary purpose question (“The author’s primary purpose is to…”), which are closely related.
Use the three-step framework:
- Step 1: Identify Balance (positive, negative, or neutral)
- Step 2: Identify Target (what specifically the author addresses)
- Step 3: Identify Intensity (mild or strong)
Focus on the first sentence of each paragraph and the last sentence of the passage. Track verbs and adjectives the author uses. Count contrast markers (however, yet, but).
No. Instead of memorizing 50+ tone words, organize them into 5 categories:
- Positive: approving, appreciative, supportive, optimistic, enthusiastic
- Negative: critical, skeptical, cynical, dismissive, contemptuous
- Neutral: analytical, descriptive, factual, objective, balanced
- Mixed/Nuanced: cautiously optimistic, grudgingly admiring, skeptically supportive
- Analytical: examining, evaluating, exploring (without judgment)
Within each category, distinguish intensity levels: mild vs strong. “Skeptical” is milder than “dismissive.” “Appreciative” is milder than “enthusiastic.”
60-90 seconds maximum once you’ve read the passage.
Tone questions should actually be faster than inference or detail questions because you’re working with overall impression rather than hunting for specific textual evidence.
• Read question: 10 seconds
• Apply 3-step framework: 20 seconds
• Eliminate wrong options: 30 seconds
• Confirm right answer: 10 seconds
Total: 70 seconds
If you’re taking longer, you’re either overthinking or haven’t grasped the passage structure clearly enough. Consider re-reading the first and last paragraphs quickly to confirm your tone assessment.
Not necessarily—they test different skills:
Tone Questions: Require holistic comprehension and sensitivity to author’s stance markers. You need to pick up on subtle cues about how the author feels about what they’re discussing.
Inference Questions: Require logical reasoning from specific passage content. You need to draw conclusions that aren’t explicitly stated but follow from the evidence.
Students with strong analytical skills often find inference easier. Those with good emotional intelligence and attention to language nuance find tone easier. Both require systematic practice to master.
Analytical: Examining systematically, breaking down components, evaluating objectively without judgment. The author explains how something works or why something happens.
Critical: Pointing out flaws and weaknesses, emphasizing problems, questioning effectiveness with negative judgment. The author identifies what’s wrong or insufficient.
Analytical = neutral examination → “The approach has three components: X, Y, and Z, each serving distinct functions.”
Critical = negative evaluation → “The approach has several significant flaws that undermine its effectiveness.”
Check if the author is explaining (analytical) or criticizing (critical). Analytical writing avoids evaluative language. Critical writing emphasizes negative assessment.
Practice the three-step framework on 5 passages daily:
Before looking at options, write down: (1) positive/negative/neutral, (2) the target, (3) mild/strong intensity. Then check the options. If you did this correctly, 3-4 options will eliminate themselves instantly.
Track marker words systematically:
- Count contrast markers (however, yet, but) to identify balanced vs directional tones
- Track verbs and adjectives the author uses (“transformed” vs “disrupted”)
- Note hedge words (may, might, seems) for mild tone
- Note intensifiers (clearly, obviously, merely) for strong tone
Build a mental catalog over time. By the 50th passage, tone recognition becomes automatic.
Connect with Prashant
Founder, WordPandit & EDGE | CAT VARC Expert
With 18+ years of teaching experience and thousands of successful CAT aspirants, I'm here to help you master VARC. Whether you're stuck on RC passages, vocabulary building, or exam strategy—let's connect and solve it together.
Stuck on RC or VARC? Let's Solve It Together! 💡
Don't let doubts slow you down. Whether it's a tricky RC passage, vocabulary confusion, or exam strategy—I'm here to help. Choose your preferred way to connect and let's tackle your challenges head-on.
🌟 Explore The Learning Inc. Network
8 specialized platforms. 1 mission: Your success in competitive exams.
Trusted by 50,000+ learners across India
Learn.WordPandit
Learn With Prashant Sir
Mentor-led courses for CAT, GMAT, GRE, GD/PI/WAT. Structured learning with expert guidance.
WordPandit
Master Words. Master Exams.
10,000+ words with roots methodology. Your vocabulary foundation for competitive exams.
Preplite
Smart Learning. Smaller Budgets.
Affordable self-prep micro-courses. Pay only for what you need. Learn at your pace.
Readlite
Read Smart. Comprehend Better.
Daily curated articles across 60+ subjects. Build reading comprehension for RC mastery.
Easy Hinglish
English Seekhna Ab Hua Aasan!
Learn English the Indian way. Vocabulary explained in Hindi and English for better retention.
GD PI WAT
Ace Your MBA Interviews.
1,000+ GD topics, PI questions, and WAT guidance. Complete MBA admission prep.
GK365
Stay Informed. Stay Ahead.
Daily GK updates and current affairs. Never miss what matters for competitive exams.
Ask English Pro
Your Personal English Mentor.
Get expert answers to all your English questions with detailed video explanations.